IP consolidation for a software group before a funding round
IP written by contractors in four countries, owned by nobody in particular, three months before a Series B diligence process.
The brief
A software group had developed its platform through contractors engaged by three different group companies across four countries. Nobody could produce a clean chain of title. An IP box claim was being made by an entity that had neither funded nor directed the development.
- Chain of title had to be reconstructed and assigned properly before diligence, not during it.
- The nexus fraction had to be evidenced per asset from real expenditure records.
- Moving IP would trigger exit taxation somewhere; the cost had to be quantified before the decision.
- DEMPE functions had to genuinely follow the IP, which meant moving people, not just contracts.
The tax outcome follows the functions. Moving legal title without moving the development team would have failed diligence and transfer pricing alike.
- Royalties up
- Sales entities pay arm's-length royalties, supported by a benchmarking study prepared before the round.
- Relief applied
- The IP box applies only to the nexus-adjusted portion, evidenced by per-asset R&D expenditure tracking.
- Diligence
- A single clean owner with recorded assignments replaced a chain of title no investor would have accepted.
How it was built, in order
- 01Title audit
Every contractor engagement reviewed; missing assignments identified and re-executed with consideration and dates recorded.
- 02Exit tax quantified
Cost of moving each asset out of its current owner calculated before any decision, and one asset deliberately left where it was.
- 03Owner chosen on substance
Cyprus selected because the core engineering team could realistically be based there, not because of the headline rate.
- 04People moved with the IP
Eight engineers relocated or hired locally so DEMPE functions genuinely sat with the owner.
- 05Nexus tracking implemented
Per-asset R&D expenditure tracking put in place from the first day of the new structure, distinguishing related from unrelated outsourcing.
- 06Transfer pricing file
Royalty rates benchmarked and documented so the licences would survive both diligence and a future audit.
- Clean, recorded chain of title in a single owner before the data room opened.
- IP box claimed on an evidenced nexus fraction rather than an assumed headline rate.
- DEMPE functions and returns aligned, removing the largest transfer pricing exposure in the group.
- Round closed without an IP-related diligence issue.
A founder-led SaaS group with subsidiaries in three countries and no holding company, nine weeks before signing with a US strategic buyer.
A UK principal exiting the remittance basis after April 2025, needing genuine UAE substance while keeping European property assets working.
A MENA payments group entering EU B2B payments, needing a passportable licence ring-fenced from the operating parent.