First fund for an emerging manager, launched in fourteen weeks
A two-person team with anchor capital from both US taxable and non-US investors, and no infrastructure at all.
The brief
Two portfolio managers leaving a larger firm had soft commitments from a US endowment, two US taxable family offices and a European institution. They needed a structure that worked for all of them and a launch date that matched the endowment's allocation cycle.
- Mixed investor base meant a single-vehicle fund would have failed one group or another.
- The manager entity had to be placed where the team actually lived and worked.
- Prime brokerage onboarding, not the regulator, was the binding constraint on the timeline.
- Budget was an emerging manager's, so nothing unnecessary could be built.
Two feeders exist because the investors have different tax profiles, not because the strategy needs them.
- Subscriptions
- Each investor enters the feeder matching its tax profile; both feeders subscribe into the master.
- Fees
- Management and performance fees charged at feeder level and paid to the manager under the IMA.
- Compliance
- Annual audited accounts by a CIMA-approved auditor, fund annual return, FATCA and CRS through the administrator.
How it was built, in order
- 01Structure fixed in week one
Confirmed a master-feeder was genuinely required by the investor base rather than defaulting to it.
- 02Manager entity placed deliberately
Investment manager established where the team actually works, keeping the Cayman fund management substance test out of scope.
- 03Documents drafted in parallel
Offering memorandum, articles, IMA, subscription documents and administration agreement progressed together rather than sequentially.
- 04Prime broker started first
Onboarding opened in week two, because it was known to be the critical path, not the regulator.
- 05Directors and auditor engaged
Independent directors registered and a CIMA-approved auditor appointed ahead of registration.
- 06CIMA registration filed
Registration under the Mutual Funds Act completed once the operator and audit appointments were in place.
- Fund launched in fourteen weeks, in time for the endowment's allocation cycle.
- All three investor types accommodated without anyone taking an unintended tax position.
- Manager entity sited so that no Cayman economic substance obligation arose on the management business.
- Launch budget held, with no vehicle or service provider added that the structure did not need.
A founder-led SaaS group with subsidiaries in three countries and no holding company, nine weeks before signing with a US strategic buyer.
A UK principal exiting the remittance basis after April 2025, needing genuine UAE substance while keeping European property assets working.
A MENA payments group entering EU B2B payments, needing a passportable licence ring-fenced from the operating parent.